Clumps of pollen are often interpreted as
the remains of anther fragments by archeological palynologists. Because of
their greater mass per surface-area, these single-type
clumps are used as indicators of short dispersal
distance from the parent plant; i.e., the
plant was growing near the site of sedimentation.
However, the anther-fragment interpretation cannot
be true from clumps of pollen containing more than
one pollen type. These mixed-type clumps occur in
various kinds of aquatic and terrestrial sediment.
They are similar in size and shape to more common
clumps of unidentifiable organic debris (FIGURE AT LEFT).
The origin of the debris clumps and the mixed-type
clumps is not known, but they may be fecal pellets
of small arthropods.
|
|
Davis (1988) has noted clumped pollen in microscopic fecal
pellets from Blackwater Draw, New Mexico, and has recovered
them in 7 other archeological sites. This "fecal" type of
pollen clump is easily differentiated from other pollen
aggregates by its uniform size and shape. They are small
(40 - 100 µm), oval pellets (LEFT) containing pollen
or unidentifiable organic matter. About 5% contain identifiable
pollen (OTHER FIGURES).
|
|
The pellets are particularly abundant in the surface sediment
of dry caves (Davis, 1990), but they also are present in open,
stratified archaeological sites (Davis, 1991). At an open site
in coastal Orange County, California (CA-Ora-225), the pellets
are more abundant than pollen (Davis, 1990). The pellets are
less common, but present in aquatic sites (Davis 1992).
|
|
(From letter to E.J. Cushing dated 10/18/96)
The clumps are CLEARLY not artifacts
of processing. Although the two- and
several- type clumps sometimes fragment
to have only five or six grains, they ordinarily
have more. MORE IMPORTANTLY, they have
a consistent form. They are oval, with
the grains "packed" into a streamlined
shape. Conifer grains in the "pack" are
usually broken, and nearly all the grains
are crumpled. . . .
I believe they are the feces of leaf-gleaning
insects, pollinating flies, ground-dwelling
mites, or termites. I believe they are most
abundant below the surface, based on
stratigraphic archaeological samples.
I asked for illustrations of the feces of
pollinating flies from the (polpal) list, but have
received no response.
|
|
(From letter to E.J. Cushing dated 10/18/96)
The pollen clumps are "stuck together" somehow. I
look at intermediate steps in the pollen
process sometimes, and the clumps are
larger and "fluffy" before acetolysis,
KOH, and dehydration. By the way, the larger
(1-2 mm), wood-termite feces are preserved
in aquatic sediments. Perhaps the termite's
gut enzymes break down the cellulose and it
forms a "glue." Or, maybe their enzymes
can partially break down sporopollenin. Or,
maybe the cohesion is largely due to the
physical compaction in the gut. Regardless,
the pellets are more compact and denser than
the aquatic-organism pellets I've seen.
|
DAVIS, O.K.
1988 Sources of pollen clumps found in archeological
samples. Abstract, American Association of
Stratigraphic Palynologists. November 10-12, Houston,
Texas.
DAVIS, O.K.
1990 Pollen analysis of archeological sites. pp. J1 -
J37 IN de Barros, P. and Koerper, H.C. (editors) Final
test investigation report and request for determination
of eligibility for 23 sites along the San Joaquin Hills
transportation Corridor. Report by the Chambers Group,
Inc., to Transportation Corridor Agencies, Costa Mesa,
California.
DAVIS, O.K.
1991 Preliminary pollen analysis of ethnobotanical
samples from Grasshopper Pueblo. Report to J. Welch,
Anthropology, University of Arizona.
DAVIS, O.K.
1992 Rapid climatic change in coastal southern
California inferred from pollen analysis of San Joaquin
Marsh. Quaternary Research, 37:89-100.
DAVIS, O.K. and BUCHMANN, S.L.
1994 Insect sources of pollen clumps in archeological
sites in Southwestern U.S.A.: ground-nesting bees and
mites. AASP Contribution Series. 29:63-74
GOERTZ, A.
1992. On Parasitus coleopterorum - the Hitchhiker, in:
YES Quarterly 9: 4-6.
ROBBINS, E.I., CUOMO, M.C., HABERYAN, K.A., MUDIE, P.J.,
CHEN, Y.-Y., AND HEAD E.
1996 Chapter 27. Fecal pellets; in: Jansonius, J.
and McGregor, D.C. (ed.), Palynology: principles and
applications; American Association of Stratigraphic
Palynologists Foundation, vl. 3, p. 1085-1097.
Arthropods that eat feces [LINK]
Owen Davis 3/03
home
|